Crypto is Macro Now

Crypto is Macro Now

The performance and the non-message message

Noelle Acheson's avatar
Noelle Acheson
Jul 30, 2026
∙ Paid

“They knew many things but had no idea why. And strangely this made them more, rather than less, certain that they were right.” – Neal Stephenson ||

Hi everyone! I hope you’re all well…

This is a short email today as this throat infection and consequent lack of sleep are slowing me down.

I am VERY much looking forward to my chat with Michael Howell in today’s Press Publish livestream, though (details below), so DO come and join us – by then, I will have drunk gallons of ginger tea.

👀 You’re reading Crypto is Macro Now, which covers the role crypto is playing in the changing plates of finance, economics, politics, culture and markets. 👀


PUBLISHED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH: ✨ ALLIUM ✨

Are agentic stablecoin payments becoming a thing?

Software agents now pay each other, for data, API calls or compute – but the volume is tiny. The two main agentic rails are x402 (concentrated on the Base blockchain) and MPP (a protocol on Tempo), and about $4.5 million has moved across them over the last 90 days, in 24 million tiny payments.

→ For more, download Allium’s State of Onchain Finance report: https://allium.so/reports/state-of-onchain-finance-q2-26


IN THIS NEWSLETTER

  • Markets: the performance and the non-message message

  • Term of the day: Baumol’s cost disease

Crypto is Macro Now offers ~daily commentary and updates on the overlap between the crypto and macro landscapes. Plus links and more.

If you’re a premium subscriber, thank you so much!! ❤

If you’re not, I hope you’ll consider becoming one – you could be getting a lot more out of these newsletters!

WHAT I’M WATCHING:


✨Press Publish with Michael Howell✨

Join me later today for a Substack Live chat with Michael Howell, founder and managing director of GL Indexes and author of the Capital Wars newsletter. We’re not going to talk about Michael’s area of expertise, global liquidity, tempting as that may be. Instead, we’re going to discuss newslettering.

We’re going to talk about Michael’s writing, why he does what he does, how he juggles his time, highlights, frustrations, publishing platforms and more. A back-room glimpse into how his insightful output gets made.

👉 TODAY – 3pm BST / 4pm CEST / 10am EST – come join us!

Link to livestream: https://open.substack.com/live-stream/294553


Markets: the performance

Well, that was disappointing.

Not that the FOMC chose to keep the US federal funds rate steady – I thought they should hike, but had low confidence they would.

Rather, it was disappointing because I expected a lively press conference. It was one of the most boring I remember, and that’s saying something.

Before we get into the impact of the message in the non-message, a recap: the FOMC decided to keep the federal funds rate at current levels between 3.50%-3.75%, and three voters dissented.

It was widely expected there would be dissents, but three is a lot. True, April’s meeting had four, but only one was on the rate decision (Miran wanted to lower rates), the other three were on the language of the statement. Removing that, there have been only four FOMC meetings with three dissents in the past 10 years.

(chart via Bloomberg)

As Jim Bianco put it, “dissents are the new forward guidance”.

Given the uncertainty regarding the FOMC’s position going into the meeting, the market showed some muted relief that the committee was not worried enough about overheating to raise rates – the S&P 500 jumped and bond yields fell, but just a little bit.

Then came the press conference.

This turned out to be a masterclass of how to say virtually nothing.

We got a lot of emphasis (and I mean a lot) on how committed the committee is, how competent and dedicated etc. How they’re thinking deeply about things, including how to think about things. How they will get the job done but won’t tell us how because they’re thinking about things.

Let’s just say that Warsh is very good at press conferences, better than most politicians, eerily good for a central banker. He’s deft at going through the motions of answering questions while repeating his honed message, deflecting, creating a personal rhetoric. He has the charm and the oration down pat – addressing journalists by their names, using graceful yet emphatic hand movements, and most of the press corp seemed to love it.

But not all.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Noelle Acheson.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Noelle Acheson · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture